Do you believe antigravity propulsion (aka UFO/flying saucer tech) is the result of human or alien technologies?

Posted: December 23, 2014 in Antigravity Propulson, Underground Knowledge
Tags: , , , , ,

We pose this question to members of our ‘Underground Knowledge’ group (on Goodreads.com) in our latest poll – and early results show poll respondent are fairly evenly divided in their views. To date, 30% nominate alien technologies, 26% nominate human/alien (hybrid) technologies, 18% are unsure, 17% don’t believe in flying saucers and 9% nominate human technologies.  

One interesting comment received from those polled came in from Dr. Takaaki Musha, Director of Japan’s Advanced-Science Technology Research Organization, who said, “I think there are two main streams to develop the antigravity technology. One is an extraterrestrial origin and the other is a human origin. But the extraterrestrial one is very advanced.”

We address these questions and more in our soon-to-be-released book, ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION: Human or Alien Technologies?

Antigravity Propulsion cover.jpg

Meanwhile, to view the latest poll results, or to have YOUR say, go to: https://www.goodreads.com/poll/show/112963-do-you-believe-antigravity-propulsion-aka-ufo-flying-saucer-tech-is-th

Poll closes December 28.

*

Membership of our ‘Underground Knowledge’ discussion group has now topped 390, making it one of the fastest growing groups of its kind – if not the fastest – on the popular Goodreads site.

Goodreads: Book reviews, recommendations, and discussion

This group is open to everyone! All you need is an enquiring mind, an interest in the world we live in and a desire to learn or to uncover “underground knowledge” on important issues of our times. Our members include scientists, historians, conspiracy theorists, students, authors, doctors,  a few shit-stirrers (3), one or two rednecks (2), a member of the Tinfoil Hat Brigade  and many more.

To visit our Underground Knowledge group go to: https://www.goodreads.com/group/show/142309-underground-knowledge—a-discussion-group

 

*************************************

 

Advertisements
Comments
  1. RUSSELL says:

    inertial propulsion 40 times more efficient than a jet engine.

Leave a Reply (email address NOT required)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s