It’s worth noting that not all who are opposed to the vaccine law reforms being considered in California, the US and elsewhere in the world are against child immunizations. As we point out in our new book MEDICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: The $ickness Industry, Big Pharma and Suppressed Cures, some (anti) campaigners have either had their own children vaccinated or have advised other parents to vaccinate, but also argue that making immunizations mandatory is unconstitutional and against citizens’ medical freedom.
Further to our recent blog on this very subject, here’s another excerpt from Medical Industrial Complex:
Are those who do not vaccinate their own children putting other children, and society as a whole, at risk?
We cannot confidently answer that. Nor, it appears, can anyone. Not with any degree of certainty.
Added to the difficulty of sourcing accurate research and reliable statistics is the problem of widespread corruption highlighted in earlier chapters. Sad but unsurprising in any industry as profitable as Big Pharma.
A February 15, 2015 article about vaccines, published on the Collective Evolution website and written by Arjun Walia, nicely summarizes a global trend. Headlined ‘The Top 6 Reasons Why Parents Are Choosing Not To Vaccinate Their Kids’, the article quotes Walia as saying, “More and more parents around the globe are choosing to opt out of vaccinating themselves and their children”.
The article continues, “As a result of this trend that’s been gaining more and more momentum, a harsh response has come from the ‘pro-vaccine’ community-criticizing parents for their decision to not vaccinate. At the end of the day it’s not really about ‘pro-vaccination’ or ‘anti-vaccination,’ it’s not one ‘against’ the other or about pointing fingers and judgement, it’s simply about looking at all of the information from a neutral standpoint. It’s about asking questions and communicating so people can make the best possible decisions for themselves and their children.
“Parents love their kids and the vaccine ‘controversy’ has made it difficult for many parents to know what to do”.
Walia says, “Parents who are choosing not to vaccinate their children are not just doing it based on belief, they are doing it based on science and information. This science and information is nowhere near emphasized to the point where the science and information on the other side of the coin is (‘pro vaccine’).
“Parents who choose not to vaccinate themselves or their children are clearly intelligent, and they should not be made to look like fools. On the other hand, parents who are choosing to vaccinate their children are also intelligent.
“Those who choose to vaccinate should not be made out to be the ones who have made the ‘right’ decision when there is evidence on both sides of the coin that clearly shows parents who are not vaccinating their children could also be making the ‘right’ decision”.
The article lists (as follows) the top six reasons parents choose not to vaccinate their kids:
- The Vaccine/Autism Controversy
- Scientific/Industry Fraud
- The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
- The Ineffectiveness Of Some Vaccines And Vaccine Injury
- Vaccine Ingredients
- Vaccine Safety Evidence Is Not Rock Solid. One Size Does Not Fit All.
In his conclusion, Walia presents a fairly balanced argument that suggests it’s time to open up the debate as currently the pro-vaccination lobby is the only one that’s being given airtime in the mainstream media.
Besides the fact that pharmaceutical companies cannot be trusted, the other aspect in the equation is that virtually all vaccines are loaded with chemicals and other poisons.
Here’s a rundown on some of the damaging ingredients in vaccines on the market today, as listed on the Healthy Home Economist website in a 2015 article:
“MSG, antifreeze, phenol (used as a disinfectant), formaldehyde (cancer causing and used to embalm), aluminum (associated with alzheimer’s disease and seizures), glycerin (toxic to the kidney, liver, can cause lung damage, gastrointestinal damage and death), lead, cadmium, sulfates, yeast proteins, antibiotics, acetone (used in nail polish remover), neomycin and streptomycin. And the ingredient making the press is thimerosol (more toxic than mercury, a preservative still used in many vaccines, not easily eliminated, can cause severe neurological damage as well as other life threatening autoimmune disease). These vaccines are grown and strained through animal or human tissue, like monkey and dog kidney tissue, chick embryo, calf serum, human diploid cells (the dissected organs of aborted fetuses), pig blood, horse blood and rabbit brain.”
The article also states that other countries are waking up to the dangers of vaccines. “In 1975, Japan raised its minimum vaccination age to two years. The country’s infant mortality subsequently plummeted to such low levels that Japan now enjoys one of the lowest levels in the Western world (#3 at last look). In comparison, the United States’ infant mortality rate is #33.
(It should be mentioned the Japanese ruling has since been amended. According to the Vaccination Liberation-Information site, Japan’s health authorities now recommend six vaccinations via injection in the first year of life, and three more in the second year. That, according to the same source, compares to 20 vaccinations in the first two years of life of most American children).
The Healthy Home Economist article continues, “In Australia, the flu vaccine was recently suspended (April 2010) for children under 5 because an alarming number of children were showing up in the emergency rooms with febrile convulsions or other vaccine reactions within hours of getting this shot”.
After researching the pros and cons of immunizations, and listening to all sides of the debate, we still have NO IDEA what the best decision is for parents to make regarding that most tricky of questions – to vaccinate or not to vaccinate.
However, we do agree there needs to be a wider public debate as this issue ain’t necessarily as cut and dried as Big Pharma and others in the Medical Industrial Complex would have us believe.
As with many cases involving extreme or polarizing points of view, we suspect the truth regarding child immunizations is probably somewhere in the middle ground. We also disregard (and recommend you do, too) the “evil mega conspiracy” implications some anti-vaccine campaigners trot out just as we disregard the “science is already 100% proven and safe” claims the pro-vaccine lobby loudly trumpets.
We also think that, at the very least, those adults who are happy to vaccinate their children should be demanding en masse that pharmaceutical companies remove all the toxic chemicals and other poisons that are loaded in these vaccines. When you scan the ingredients, which read like they belong in a can of household paint, it’s obvious these things just cannot be good for the health and wellbeing of a child’s brain or body!
For all we know it may be better for a child to be subjected to all these doses of chemicals and poisons than risk contracting serious diseases like polio, but does that make it right? And is everything that can be done, being done, to make vaccines’ ingredients less toxic and safer?
It’s unfortunate that only a small percentage of the public are aware of what exactly is in vaccines. If more people were made aware, and if enough demanded less poisonous vaccines, then Big Pharma would be forced to change.
Boycotting products and putting public pressure on corporations and governments can be a very effective way to enforce change. Ultimately, the power rests with the people – the 99 percent.
If enough demand change, it will happen. And it does seem at least some changes are needed in this most vexing of issues – the vaccination of our children.
You have been reading an excerpt from Medical Industrial Complex. To view the book on Amazon go to: http://www.amazon.com/MEDICAL-INDUSTRIAL-COMPLEX-Suppressed-Underground-ebook/dp/B00Y8Y3TUM/